Proposed selection methods, such as motivation letters, are reinforcing the inequalities more than grades and standardised testing (eg, Długosz 2014 on inequalities between rural and urban youth in Polish and Ukrainian schools, in western studies eg. Alvero et al. 2021). Essays and motivation letters are more susceptible to (paid) coaching and pre-existing cultural capital (Cho-Baker et al. 2025). Before introduction of standardised testing in some countries, admissions to higher education were heavily influenced by connections and bribery (eg, Osiplan 2009). Furthermore, weak comparability of essays or motivation makes the decision on admission less transparent, and inequalities harder to detect and fight.
Moreover, "an exam that doesn’t require specific preparation" can mean anything, from European standardised testing instead of school-specific tests favoured by privileged groups, through testing of basic reasoning and communication skills (which, again, reinforce inequalities more than standardised testing), to something equalling the lottery. This sentence requires more precised wording.
| Resolution: | No Future Without Education: Facing Inequalities through Rights and Participation |
|---|---|
| Proposer: | Ostra Zieleń |
| Status: | Published |
| Submitted: | 05/17/2026, 14:06 |
